90 Year Old Woman Receives First Covid Jab

But why are we forcing our nation’s most vulnerable to run a gauntlet of disease to receive a potentially lifesaving vaccine?

The UK’s health system has significant access issues.  It is also entering the winter period during a pandemic.  And the NHS can’t cope with seasonal flu numbers even in a normal year.  It remains to be seen how the winter flu season coupled with Covid will impact NHS Trusts performance.  Firstly, on the positive side, there are indications that the incidences of flu are significantly lower than in previous years.  The fact remains that even with lower flu rates, NHS hospitals will be struck by their annual winter crisis overlaid by the pandemic.

The government has decided that the best way to distribute the new Covid-19 vaccine is to hand it to an already overstressed, and in some cases dysfunctional system.  Descriptions of the planned distribution indicate it will revolve around patients having to access large hard to access NHS Hospitals.   To complicate matters, the Pfizer vaccine requires recipients to take a second jab 30 days later to be effective.  

We still have not fully calculated the impact that Covid has had on patients when care was denied or delayed.  There is reporting suggesting that waits are conservatively being pushed much further than a year.  We may never know the real number of deaths caused by delayed diagnosis and treatment. As it is hard to capture undiagnosed people who never entered the system.   

What we do know is that the UK routinely scores at the bottom of measured cancer survivorship. Even before the pandemic began.  In 2019 when compared against six comparable national health systems, the NHS was last. The main reason the UK languishes at the bottom of performance charts for cancer survivorship is access to diagnostics.  

Long waits for scans from machines that typically reside in large NHS hospitals are killing patients.  When the impact of Covid is finally measured, many thousands will have lost their lives. Many from not being able to access simple diagnostics.  This will also apply to the millions who suffer from diabetes, heart disease, and other chronic diseases. The disruption of just administering a jab is not what the struggling NHS needs.  Even if it delays one person’s scan, who then goes on to die, it should be seen as one too many.  The reality is that it will most likely impact thousands.  

This approach also relies on the struggling NHS ambulance service. Transport those who can’t make it on their own to the place where they will receive the vaccine. This, at a time when isolation from potential exposure to the virus is the most effective way of preserving life.  Picking recipients up with others at risk in enclosed vehicles. Then transporting them to places riddled with disease and the virus itself, is inviting infection.  It’s exactly the best way to spread it to the elderly.

On the face of it, it makes sense to take people to hospitals. Use already scheduled appointments as a way of distributing the vaccine quickly.  The reality is much different; The NHS will have to re-task staff to administer the jab. Allocate space in already crowded hospitals containing potential super spreaders.  It is by far the best way to distribute the vaccine for the NHS.  And there’s the problem.  Transporting the elderly from relatively safe nursing and private homes into bug-riddled facilities is precisely the wrong thing for patients.  Requiring them to congregate in small vehicles with others is again, the wrong thing for elderly patients.  It is a recipe for disaster.  

The explanations for the current vaccine delivery will revolve around the NHS knowing who requires the vaccine.  An insistence they have the medical facilities needed to safely administer jabs. And the logistical capability in the form of NHS ambulances to transport patients.  The NHS has the necessary cold chain equipment to store the highly volatile vaccine.  All true.  The reality?  During the winter, as the NHS itself admits, the service tips into crisis.  This year’s predictions are for catastrophic impacts on patient access and care.  That includes the poorly performing ambulance trusts.  Relying on an ‘in crisis’ institution to deliver the most important inoculation programme in 100 years is folly.  By its own admission, the NHS can’t provide care this winter for many who should have access to its services.  

The NHS’s growing dysfunctionality has forced a 20% increase in NHS patients turning to the private sector for care. They pay out-of-pocket to access orthopaedic, gynaecology and ophthalmology surgeries as the NHS queues only continue to balloon.  Average cost is on average £12,000. Admittedly, we have a long tradition of stepping outside failing state services to access quality.  That is certainly so with our willingness to pay taxes and send our children to very expensive private schools.  There is a difference between a middle-aged couple gainfully employed choosing to send their children to a private school. And a pensioner who has contributed their entire life to the NHS, paying to restore their ability to walk or see.

The NHS solution centers around its already overwhelmed infrastructure.  Requires the patient to take the risk.  The government should have thought this through out of the proverbial box.  Injections are not rocket science.  With the changes by the MRHA allowing allied health professions not in the NHS to administer jabs. There now exists a deep pool of health professionals to draw from.  The cold storage of the vaccine at -70c is technically challenging. But that issue must have already been resolved by the companies who deliver the vaccine to hospitals.  So, if cold storage is mobile the rest of the delivery supply chain is easily transported.  Why didn’t we work from a position of protecting the patients and targeted distribution?

By taking the vaccine to patients. We free up the already struggling NHS to take care of those they are currently unable to. Or at the very least, not let care slip for even more patients.  We de-risk the exposure of the vulnerable to the virus. Cut out the need to use unreliable, overcrowded ambulances from the process.  As stated, this is not a complicated problem requiring the use of specialized medical facilities, or even doctors’ surgeries. Vaccines for children are given in schools.  There isn’t any reason other than the storage requirement that this vaccine can’t be administered from mobile clinics.

An immediate rethink needs to occur around the future delivery of the vaccine.  Possible solutions may involve the armed services, private sector, or even practices of physiotherapists as fast, safe, and unencumbered providers.  Taking a patient’s exposure from multiple people in high-risk in crisis facilities to one person in a safe setting. Be it their room in a nursing home or a socially distancing compliant mobile clinic, should be a priority. We must take the vaccine to patients and not require them to potentially put their lives at risk to accommodate an overwhelmed NHS. 

 

            

While the Four Horseman of the Apocalypse Circle, Labour Outlines Their Faustian Bargain

Labour Doubles Down on an Unachievable Climate Promise

At their annual conference last week, Labour promised to cleanse the UK of fossil fuels by 2030. First of all, it’s a lie. The UK would continue to use fossil fuels at the same rate, if not greater than we do today. This path would only shift our reliance on those fuels further towards environmentally disastrous nations controlled by despots.

If that’s not bad enough, we will dive further down the hole of fuel poverty for our most vulnerable citizens. The UK cannot afford to underpin an unachievable pipe dream of fossil-free living against an unproven backdrop of global catastrophic failure sometime in the future, if ever. 

Labour has forsaken the working class to worship at the altar of a false god, climate alarmism. They ask the people they claim to care about to choose between warmth and food. It will only get worse, and yet the Ukrainian War and fuel crisis which the moronic adherence to climate fanaticism has caused is portrayed as a necessity. The morally bankrupt love to lecture about unproven deaths which might be caused by climate change while completely ignoring the real prospect of death caused this winter by unaffordable or unavailable energy.

Stammer should have explained the Faustian bargain he and his fellow Labour acolytes have entered: die today so future generations might not die tomorrow. It’s easy to draw parallels with other historical movements that have sold stability on the back of chaos. The war in Ukraine has a far more significant impact on climate, not to mention human suffering and death. The possibility of that conflict spilling over into Europe and beyond is real. Would the Western European states continue to pursue the lie of dispensing with fossil fuels? Fortunately, the answer is no. Quietly the fossil fuel lie is being disassembled by the Germans, French and many other European countries. Governments are cancelling the closing of nuclear power plants, burning coal and other fossil-based fuels to keep the power on. The lie is imploding. Stammer might want to take note. 

History is Replete With Decisions Made Based on Blind Adherenece

Many times in history, people believed that extreme measures taken now would translate into nirvana sometime in the future. The Holocaust comes quickly to mind. It was Sold as a way to solve all Germany’s problems at an undefined date. If the Third Reich was still in existence, would anyone believe that the Final Solution would have been set aside so Germans could live in harmony in their newly cleansed country? The answer to that is most certainly no. Survival of totalitarian regimes requires enemies and shiny objects.

Is there any belief that if we commit to war, famine and freezing to death to bring down global temperatures by 1 degree Celsius the climate fanatics will sit back and reflect on a job well done? We already have that answer. They now demand that they dictate where and when we live, what we will eat whether we can travel. They never say if there is a benefit to demanding we follow their unachievable lifestyle and continue to ignore that a majority of the world’s population can’t afford their privileged existence. At that point, they appear extreme and authoritarian, disconnected from reality and only able to see a utopian world as the four horsemen of the apocalypse circle. Why is this any different from the vision Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin and others had, which translated solely into death and suffering? Another similarity is the need to avoid scrutiny while selling final solutions, thus the insistence that the science has been settled. 

The darkest moments in our history were predicated on a blind belief in solutions that played out as horrific events. Which entire populations bought into, supported and enabled or were subjugated to those solutions believing that they had to relinquish morals, freedom and, often, their lives for the undefined greater good.

To Bring Along Populations, You Must First Banish Free Speech

Ideologues don’t deal with reality and hate free speech. They define everything using words such as existential, world-ending event, and we must act now. It’s the ultimate shiny object strategy. If what they had to sell had value and was supported by the science they claim to love, the argument would speak for itself. They wouldn’t have to cloak it in catastrophic speech and unsubstantiated outcomes. Government and the media wouldn’t have to shut down people who question the doctrine, cancel them, or destroy their lives as they would be lone voices in a wilderness devoid of fact and content. The climate lobby has effectively kicked into touch any discussion or investigation of their set of “facts” with the “settled science” statement. As I have stated before, it took the Catholic Church until 1996 to declare that the “settled science” of the earth being flat was wrong. Many lost their lives, permanently cancelled, for contradicting the flat earth settled science. 

Today with the power of a compliant media, the climate lobby doesn’t have to kill the heretic; they have to destroy them entirely in the public square or not allow them access. That begs the question; how settled is the “settled science”? If it is so fragile that a few heretics can persuade large swathes of the population with lies, to be clear, that is the argument presented by the climate alarmists. Then on what foundation are they asking us to completely dismantle our civilization, kill millions from starvation, freeze in the winters, fry in the summer and never leave our high-density boxes? It should be compelling and not based on an ideology like the flat earth lie. 

Labour should have outlined solutions addressing today’s reality

Labour should have addressed the fundamental issues of war, famine, and fuel poverty. Presented solutions which addressed real and palatable existential threats. Provided a set of solutions to the elderly that would manage the real possibility that many will lose their lives having surrendered our energy security to other countries. They might have wanted to present a vision for the realities of today and not immediately move to their ideological view that we will all die sometime in the future and not submit a lie that we will be free of fossil fuels in 8 years.

When faced with hard decisions, most politicians point to the shiny object. They believe their political survival is jeopardized by addressing reality and prefer to hide amongst ill-defined and unproven future solutions. Unfortunately, we are walking blindly into a regional war with a state controlling most of Western Europe’s energy needs. If Russia stops supplying energy to Europe, the effect will be disastrous and deadly and they won’t even need to fire a shot, bringing Europe to its knees, necessitating a new Faustian bargain with an autocratic nation who sees us as an existential threat 

The Nord Stream Attack Signals a Serious Escalation in the March Towards Total European Conflict

The Nord Stream pipeline is spewing millions of gallons of Methane into the atmosphere.  Today the EU has said, without identifying the culprit, it was sabotage.  From a security and climate perspective, this is a disaster.  Europe’s energy crisis will not be solved by the installation of more inefficient solar panels or blights on the landscape in the form of massive windmills.  It will be sorted by force and a complete 180 degree change in how we source energy. 

The progressive leaders of the western world, for the most part, have never experienced war.  They might want to note that War will erase any gain from electric vehicles many thousands of times over.  Our fanatical commitment to “climate change” is walking us to a place most have never seen before.

The war in Ukraine supported by billions of dollars and Ukraine flag overlays on twitter accounts will only become real when it lands with both feet in western Europe.  That event comes closer every day and the Nord Stream sabotage is a dramatic step forward in bringing conflict to Germany’s leafy suburbs and it spilling over into the rest of mainland Europe.

The Italian election is signaling a change in Europe.  Call the new Prime Minister what you will, fascist, Mussolini replacement, whatever slur you can think of, but she’s there because people are starting to reject the progressive agenda.  What are the predictions for the rest of Europe after a winter of cold and death and potentially a threat of war?  Hopefully political change.  The outcome could be much worse.

Few periods in human history have seen this level of insanity.  The complete rejection of common sense for an idealistic pipe dream.  Nazi Germany pursued a utopia created by the extermination of millions, but they were not able to convince much of the rest of the world it was an appropriate way forward.  Nor did they force their views down the throats of hapless third world countries.  

The current global psychosis will bring about the end of civilization far quicker than a 1 degree change in global temperatures.  It is human nature to ignore what must be done and concentrate on trying to boil oceans and pursue what can’t be done.

Europe is heading towards, at best, thousands of deaths from lack of fuel this winter.  At worst, a regional conflict caused by leaders blind to the realities of the world, convinced by their own hubris that continuing to attempt to solve a problem which will resolve if they leave markets alone, is a better policy than protecting their citizens from war, famine and death. 

Is the NHS a Cult?

This was written at the beginning of the year, 2022 and I’m only posting it now. However, nothing has changed other than the NHS has continued to deteriorate……..


a system of religious veneration and devotion directed towards a particular figure or object.

Oxford Languages

The Daily Telegraph reported this week that the proposed chairman of the English National Health Service (NHS) was grilled by parliamentarians who were concerned he had used private healthcare. More importantly they questioned his devotion to the NHS given his lack of exclusive use.

An opinion piece in the same paper asked why we weren’t reforming our two worst services. The BBC and the NHS. I don’t know anything about BBC reform, but I have a great deal of experience trying to inject change into the NHS. The NHS has mastered repelling change.

At times Prime Ministers have had a positive impact of the NHS’s delivery of services. When Blair left office, he had effectively reduced waits for outpatient surgery to almost nil. All but stopped patients from dying in A&E’s because they were not prioritised with a sever heart condition.

The headwinds Blair faced were extreme. In 2011 the former NHS CEO Nigel Crisped penned a book which encapsulated why the NHS is able to thwart systemic change saying “I wanted the private sector working in the NHS on our terms”. Control is essential to insure change wont take place.

This brings us back to the current debate on the new chairman. Essentially he needs to drink the Kool Aid. Dispense with an objective, not the NHS viewpoint. I’ll separate comments about the civil servants like Crisp who run the “service” from providers. The “top of the shop” runs the NHS as a Ponzi scheme. They continually tell Parliament they need more money to provide the service and then never, let me repeat that, never achieve the goals they set for themselves. Only to return year after year with the same unchallenged excuse.

Unlike Madoff, they have successfully fended off real scrutiny of what they should have supplied for the money provided. A major fly in the ointment are those who are not members of the cult. They can actually look past the hyperbolic claims of the members. Theirs is a dispassionate view.

When you pull back the curtain, you see a failing public service that is very reliant on private healthcare. NHS managers quietly let them in the back door to help treat patients. They stand on the front steps of the hospital claiming that the private sector are only in healthcare for the money and may put patient’s lives at risk.

The reality is that you must appoint a Chairperson who will sit above the day to day rhetoric. Objectively view what has been asked of the service and what has it delivered or failed to do so. If the NHS is the vehicle the cultists claim it is, struggling from underinvestment while remaining the very best way to treat patients. This will shine through. The spin will be unnecessary.

Brexit For Our Time!

Knife to a Gunfight

Johnson has always fancied himself as a modern-day Churchill. The last-minute “deal” on Brexit was more reminiscent of Chamberlain. Another Sir, Sean Connery, once famously said, “never bring a knife to a gunfight”. In some respects, we didn’t even have a knife. Claims that the EU was “mean”, and didn’t deal in “good faith” fails to acknowledge that the EU’s first duty is to secure the best deal possible for the single market. The right thing for our government to have done was to have taken the same attitude towards our negotiating stance. Instead, we lept out of the bed completely naked, screaming divorce.

Another issue is the EU doesn’t trust us. They would have loved to keep us in the Union. They expressed this wish by handing us the best deal out of any members. Was it mean when we went to Brussels year after year complaining and asking for more? Or, was it looking after our interests? The EU saw it as dealing in bad faith. It seems they were excellent students.

What Deal Did We Get?

We don’t really know, is the truth. Much of what is to come has not been settled. We did get a deal for fisherman. In fact, that’s about all Boris could point to in his news conference. That and the laws we wouldn’t have to bow to. Unless we want to trade with the EU. He left that bit out.

Johnson’s promise to have a non-tariff border was a lie, much like the £350 million for the NHS. Those were his two big promises. Neither were true. Does anyone remember that? Other than fishermen, we did secure tariff-based trade for manufacturing. Those businesses are busy trying to conform to the new reality. Yes, I said tariff-based trade. The added paperwork and cost is substantial and may make many uncompetitive. We have already experienced the queues brought about by delays at the channel. Just in time supply chains are a thing of the past for now, and that will also have a negative impact on British manufacturers.

The government brings up fish a lot. Even that wasn’t an overall success. In five years we may well be back to fish wars. Remember those? A return to the good old days, you know, blackouts, the IMF bailout, and strikes. Can’t wait.

We do have a deal most of which is undefined. Little like a mortgage with a payment amount to be determined at some point by the bank.

What About the 80%?

Johnson and his barrow boys have yet to mention what’s going to happen to the majority of our economy, services. We are a service-based economy. They are too busy selling day-old fish. Fish accounts for less than 1%, although you would have thought we all owned boats.

The largest contributor by far to GDP is financial services. They are currently in limbo. The firms based solely in the UK are. Those with offices in Europe are downsizing UK operations and expanding in places like Frankfurt and Paris.

Any chance the EU will cry foul for us? Stop International firms moving people and money to Europe? Yeah right. No, the reverse. In the same way, we took advantage of the single market to make London an international finance hub, the single market countries who have long wanted a piece of London’s action will be hard at work building empires off our back. They have already moved trillions of pounds in assets out of the UK.

He’s Behind You!

It’s probably fitting that a Brexit deal appeared during the Pantomime season. They have all the same elements. A feckless arrogant character who can’t seem to keep up with his nemesis requiring help from the audience. In our case the audience failed to participate.

We are where we are, an idealistic mess punctuated by throwing our toys out of the pram. The EU didn’t hand us a bad deal; we created it ourselves and the government owns the results. That’s why they are spinning hard pointing to fish and ignoring elephants.

Brexit Was Always Going to Be An Idealistic Train Wreck – But Now It’s Even Worse

Fail to plan, well you know the rest

Brexit was always a macabre comedy. We have stumbled from one blunder to another. Applied smoke and mirrors during negotiations because we lacked any defendable position. Used the word unfair a lot. Gone to Brussells with threats and returned with absolutely nothing. The EU actually have a defensible negotiating stance. Unfair to be that prepared. wouldn’t you say? If it wasn’t going to be hard enough clawing our way from under the rubble of failed negotiations, we now have been deeply layered by manure. It’s a Covid addition. You can argue we weren’t to know, but that’s the problem with crap plans. They’re, well crap.

This morning the government announced crisis talks to avoid pre Christmas food shortages. Merry Christmas and a happy Brexit might complete the announcement.

No Food and Possibly Vaccine

The new strain has worried mainland Europe to the extent that they have effectively closed not only personal travel but trading routes. The ones which carry just in time food for our shops. It was timely for the government to tell food stores to stock up. Let’s hope they listened.

Not only are we locked down in our homes, bubbles burst, but we may also be facing food shortages. And a lot of other stuff for that matter. Germany has put these new measures in place until the end of January. Belgium and France are still deciding the length of their embargo. The vaccine comes from Belgium. Where’s that? Greasy spoon outside Calais?

Needless to say, it looks like this will stretch past our decree absolute with our former partner the EU. It was always going to be a challenge to sort out how something as dysfunctional as the no-deal Brexit would work. Let’s inject a little reality into the picture; it wasn’t ever going to work. There are many in the train’s first-class carriage slamming down lashings of Port who don’t want it too. They most likely have their wish, we will proceed from chaos to complete shambles in one move.

If incompetent politicians weren’t enough

We are not in a good place. The Brexiteers who told us a little pain was necessary to get to nirvana and a trade deal with Equatorial Guinea, are about to perform surgery without anaesthesia. It’s probably a good thing we aren’t having people round for Christmas. We wouldn’t be able to feed them.

History tells us that ideologies are dangerous. Only they would think that executing on no plan during a pandemic was good for the country. Not to mention trying to deliver a flawed plan in a perfect environment. It was already highly likely we would feel that good Brexit pain in 2021 and lots of it. Given the current state of our borders, that’s guaranteed and there may be much worse to follow.

At The Present Rate of Inoculation – It will Take At least 14 Years To Complete the Task

Number of Inoculations in a Week Heralded

The government announced this week that they had administered 138,000 Covid vaccinations in one week. To be fair, they are just getting started so that number should move up. The US Centres for Disease Control by comparison, is projecting 7 to 10 million people receiving the vaccine. Taken on its face. The UK rate of 138,000 compared to the US is pathetic. The media loves to compare raw data and ignore population size difference, so let’s be fairer. If we agree that the US population is roughly 5 times that of the UK, our rate of inoculation adjusted for the US population would be 685,000 per week. Roughly one-twelfth of the US rate. At our current rate of inoculation, it will take 14 years to administer a two-part Pfizer jab.

The Math

Let’s define our variables. Total UK population is 68 million. Roughly 16 million Brits are 17 or younger. That group will not initially receive the vaccine. Which leaves us with 52 million people who need the vaccine. Again, let’s keep this simple. It will take 377 weeks to administer fully the first of two inoculations needed for the Pfizer vaccine if it is to be effective.

If we translate that to years? More than seven to administer the first half of the Pfizer vaccine to the entire population. 14 years to complete the task. Let’s say the University of Oxford’s one-part vaccine is approved. Currently, there has been little news surrounding where it might stand other than positive sound bites from the company. For argument’s sake, let’s say it does. People will only need one jab, and let’s also assume we are able to quadruple our jabs per week. We are down to 94 weeks to complete inoculating everyone above the age of 17. Just shy of two years.

Hold on I hear people say. What about all those Pfizer folks that have already had a jab? They haven’t gone away. In fact, those who need the second jab will be at the front of the queue. It’s reasonable to assume it could take a month or two to work through that backlog if the Oxford vaccine became available today. Without a 30-day booster, the recipients of the first Pfizer jab start all over again. Either way, they are still in the count.

The Reality

It is unlikely that the NHS will have the internal capability to significantly increase the rate of patient flow related to administering the jab in the near term. They have few options that would allow that to happen which don’t require putting others in their care lives at risk. The NHS could do a number of things to free up capability to administer more jabs. They can ignore those presenting at A&E. They could cancel needed operations. Delay diagnostics for potential cancer patients and others with life-threatening conditions. There is any number of variables. All of them translates into pain, suffering and potential death for those they should be caring for.

In another post, I outlined a very effective way to administer the vaccine and free up the NHS to care for the patients who need it. If we don’t address this problem now, it is very likely we will still be talking about ways to get out from under the pandemic a year from now. Also, thousands will die needlessly, businesses will continue to close and we will have buried ourselves in a mountain of personal and national debt.

The Future?

The elephant in the room is how long will the jab be good for? Even scientists don’t know the answer to that question. What if we have to start all over again in six months?

Hilarious article about Jill Biden’s Ed D.

The head exploding faux incredulity over Mrs Biden’s inappropriate use of an honorific has hit fever pitch.

There is little doubt the elites who are complaining most. Were most likely sniping about the use of Jill’s Dr over gin and tonics before the conservative media’s incoming fire.

Great read from NR

Jill Biden’s Doctorate Is Garbage Because Her Dissertation Is Garbage

Remedies For China’s Role In The Pandemic | From the Hoover Institution

The more we learn about the origins of the coronavirus, the more the case against China grows. Chinese doctors and scientists encountered COVID-19 patients as early as November 2019, but Beijing suppressed their efforts to research the virus and warn the world. While the emergence of vaccines holds hope for an end to the pandemic, the campaign to hold China to account,
— Read on www.hoover.org/research/remedies-chinas-role-pandemic

Tap Your Brexit Slippers Together Three Times and Get a Covid Test?

Covid Tests and NHS Access Say it All

Covid tests are a distilled Brexit reality. Want to get a Covid test in Croatia? €70 back in 12 Hours. Italy? €80, back in 24 hours. Florida that bastion of people dying in the street due to private healthcare? Free. Result in 12 hours. The UK, free at the point of use healthcare? £275, back in 36 hours, if you’re lucky. Want to see? have a cataract? 2-year wait on the NHS. Wink and a nod between you and your NHS doctor. Do it tomorrow in the private hospital for £3000. Can’t walk, need a new Knee? 2 years plus NHS wait. Jump the queue for £12,000 in your local NHS hospital. Free at the point of use if you have a couple of years to be invalid. Burden on the family or you enjoy pain. But remember, it’s free at the point of use. Covid tests are the petri dish of what’s to come. Overpriced, incompetent delivery and a complete lack of customer service with little choice.

What About Brexit?

Anyone remember the seventies? Supermarket shelves were almost empty? Choice? Nonexistent. If you holiday in France or Spain, you will know that quality, choice and price all trump UK food stores. Not to mention other retailers. This week the government told stores to stockpile food. We’ve got the EU right where we want them! Anyone want to guess why? What will change at the end of this month to make the situation any better? Apparently a “Canada style arrangement”. What the hell does that mean? It’s not as far fetched as the “Australian Arrangement” though. Both ignore the first rule in trade. Keep it local. Trading with Subsaharan countries or being allowed to stay 90 days in Switzerland is fluff. They’re blowing smoke. Welcome to the third world where idealistic platitudes substitute for reality.

It’s a good guess the green and pleasant land we were promised never really existed. Instead, we will be regressing towards the days when we had to beg the IMF to financially bail us out. The reason we joined the single market in the first place. If you can’t go forward, why not head to the worst situation we found ourselves in over the last 100 years. Makes sense. Might want to try cigarette burns to extremities. That will show them. The old story of I hit him in the knee with my face.

Where do we go From here?

Now that we are hell-bent on regressing back to the future. Ignoring the fact we have been a far more financially vibrant and successful country since joining the single market. Where do we go from here? Cliff, lemmings comes to mind. We’re heading towards a precipice we have no idea as to its severity. How far we fall. If we are lucky, not much. Brexiteers tell us the pain will be worth it. For how long? Don’t be so daft. Stupid question remoaner. Just jump off the cliff and shut your mouth.

Why ask a simple question like, “How will this impact my family?” Close your eyes and believe, moron………………….

Brazilian Health Regulator Says Chinese Authorities Have Not Been Transparent About Covid-19 Vaccine

The move is a blow to China’s vaccine diplomacy efforts which have seen one of its vaccines getting approved for use in Bahrain and the UAE.

Source: Brazilian Health Regulator Says Chinese Authorities Have Not Been Transparent About Covid-19 Vaccine